Monday, August 10, 2015

PAG history: 2010 - 2011

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Pontyclun News - September Newsletter

PONTYCLUN NEWS _____________________________________________________________________________________ ISSUE 9 SEPTEMBER 2011 THE ‘LEEKS’ DEVELOPMENT GREAT ASSET TO THE AREA OR DESTROYER OF VILLAGE LIFE? By the time that you read this issue of Pontyclun News most will have heard of the vast new development proposed for the site of Leeks store, the brown land behind it and part of the virgin Pant Marsh behind that. This plan has been hatched by the developers and RCT with the minimum publicity until the project seemed almost a certainty. Questions have to be asked about this proposal before it is a fact. Firstly it is promoted as ‘The New Town Centre’. There is no ‘town’ to have a new centre. Are the planners attempting to wreck villages to form a town simply for the developer’s gain and an increase in local taxation for RCT? The pamphlet produced to promote this idea is full of over simplifications. Let us look at a few ‘pros’ and ‘cons’. It will create ‘more than 1,900 new jobs’. PRO. Jobs are needed and full employment always improves the ‘well being’ of an area. CON. This statement does not mention two facts. Firstly, that some jobs will be lost in the existing, local retail sector and, secondly, that the jobs created will be in the retail and hotel trades, probably the two lowest paid sectors in the UK. Giant factories such as Bosch have left the area and there is little to attract the kind of real employer that would replace that loss. ‘Research has shown that the locality needs additional shops business space and homes’. What ‘research’? Who was asked? PRO. More shops means more choice for the consumer. CON. It is very unlikely that existing retail outlets in the villages will survive another major onslaught. The area has already such ‘high street’ names as M & S, Boots, Aldi, Peacocks, Asda Living, Argos, Matalan, Comet and many others as well as a Tesco Extra. We also have the existing large and very useful department store of Leeks and Arthur Llewellyn Jenkins for furniture. Talbot Green has smaller convenience stores and Pontyclun has the best range of local shops in a village that one could imagine. Retail business in Pontyclun has suffered from the arrival of the small Tesco store, another Development is not wanted by locals but may be allowed by RCT. ‘..with cinema complex, cafes, restaurant, bars and a (sic) hotel’. PRO. There is not a cinema within a fair distance of the villages at present. CON. There is very little business in the area large enough to call for hotel accommodation and there is already the Miskin Manor and other, smaller establishments to serve the current need. This is not a tourist area. Pontyclun has seven restaurants and four take-away establishments already, some struggling to survive. There are many others in Talbot Green and on the A4119. How much can we eat? ‘New apartments and town houses’. Has anybody in RCT or Valad Developments tried to sell smaller modern houses in this area recently? Obviously not, since they are proving very difficult to sell and, hence, the demand for more appears fictitious. Will this be the poorly planned, tightly packed type of development with inevitable parking on pavements and generally ‘tatty’ appearance, fully approved by the planners? Probably so, from the indications in the pamphlet. CON. TRAFFIC. The pamphlet put out by the developers has ‘Andy Pandy’ traffic diagrams and an assurance that there will be no new traffic. 1,900 new jobs on the site will mean 1,000 cars per day, all the new houses and apartments will have a car, if the retail development is to succeed that will mean at least 1,000 cars per day; that is around 3,000 cars per day, in and out, mostly onto the A4119/A473 roundabout and many trying to access the M4 in the morning. You decide! Construction traffic will be a serious problem if allowed to use the A4222 through Pontyclun, Brynsadler and Talygarn. This road is already grossly overloaded. (See June Pontyclun News.) There is a PUBLIC MEETING in Pontyclun Community Centre at 7.30 pm on Thursday 22nd September organised not by PAG but by a group NOT specifically opposed to the development. Please attend and let your views be known, for or against, to PAG, the developer and RCT.. PAG NEEDS TO KNOW YOUR VIEWS URGENTLY BY E-MAIL (drmbor@aol.com)IF WE ARE TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF. PAG NEWS DISTRIBUTION. PAG HAS AN E-MAIL LIST WHICH IT USES EXCLUSIVELY TO KEEP LOCAL PEOPLE UP TO DATE WITH NEWS ITEMS BETWEEN ISSUES OF PONTYCLUN NEWS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE ON THAT LIST, PLEASE SEND YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS TO BRENDAN O’REILLY AT DrMBOR@aol.com PAG CHRISTMAS FAYRE 2011. PAG is suggesting that the village of Pontyclun and the surrounding area could hold a Victorian Christmas Fayre during the approach to Christmas 2011. This could be a two day or two evening event over a weekend for example. A lot of preparatory work has been carried out by PAG member Mark Cleverley and his ideas are really excellent. However, for this to be a success, it would need the support of the whole community and, particularly, the local businesses. It is thought best to hold the fayre principally indoors on account of the reliable local weather but a venue where there could be outside activity as well is in mind. There would be stallholders both professional and individuals, music groups, dancers, food and drink, Father Christmas, Punch and Judy, etc.. It would not be intended to make a charge for stalls but donations to PAG would be appreciated from the stallholders. If you are interested in this idea please contact PAG. The earlier the better as we feel that this could be a real community affair with much enjoyment for all at Christmas.  PAG FINANCES PAG is a totally volunteer organisation. Nobody involved with it claims expenses or is paid and the only expenditures that we have are donations to local causes and the cost of printing Pontyclun News. We do rely on a very small number of members for this and we would like to ask that anybody who feels that a local action group such as PAG is worthwhile make a small gift to our funds. This could be a once a year donation or a standing order for a small amount each month (say £1 to £5). If you would like to make a regular payment to PAG please let the Chairman know and the treasurer will contact you with the necessary bank details. Thank you all in advance.  The By-pass Issue. Comments that PAG has received on the article in June’s issue of Pontyclun News have been, with one exception, all in favour of the by-pass idea. PAG will consider what action it can take in the near future.  NEWS FROM PONTYCLUN COMMUNITY TRUST Latest news on the land at BRYNSADLER MILL is that a ‘final’ version of the lease has been agreed by both sides. This has been sent to the Welsh Government by Pontyclun Community Council, once again via their solicitor. This was a totally agreed version and the Trust understands that no further changes will be made before the proposed lease is submitted to the WG. At the Trust AGM on 17th August, this was reported to Trust Members present and the only question was, ‘How long now?’ The Trust has no idea of how long the WG will take to deal with this matter but it clearly hopes that WG will realise the urgency of getting the land back into a well managed state. As soon as the WG approval is in place, a formal lease signing ceremony will be arranged.  PONTYCLUN NEWS TO GROW? PAG is considering increasing the size of Pontyclun News from its present two pages to four. To do this it would be of great help to obtain a very small amount of revenue from advertising. The facilities to insert existing pictures and artwork exist. Would local businesses interested in the possibility of really low cost advertising distributed to the whole area, please contact the PAG Chairman (details below). 

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

PAG is holding a fashion show to raise funds and we hope to give a donation to the Pontyclun Soccer Club to help them with their new Clubhouse.

This is a women only event and I am informed that these fashion shows are great fun.


The event is taking place in the Athletics Club on Tuesday 22nd March at 7.30pm.


The clothes are by Greenhouse which is a top label.


There will be a sale rack with price reductions.


We’ll have wine & nibbles and there will be a great raffle with prizes donated by local businesses.



Tickets are £5


We only have 200 tickets – if you want to invite friends please let one of us know so that we can get you the number of tickets that you need. If there are leftover tickets they will be available at the door.

PAG has quite a sizeable email list but many residents are not on our list. We will have posters up in the village and word will go around but if you have a neighbour or friend who you think would like to go to this event please let them know about it.

We are grateful to the Athletics Club which is helping PAG with this event.

We really would be grateful for your support.


Sincerely,


Brendan O’Reilly

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

PAG Newsletter No 7

PONTYCLUN NEWS
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ISSUE 7 DECEMBER 2010


DO WE NEED TO BE ‘CALMED’ IN PONTYCLUN?

The all embracing proposals for ‘traffic calming’ in the village have been shown to all in public exhibitions of the plans in the Community Centre and the Library. PAG accepts that there are many views on these proposals, some for and some against, and that there are some questions that need to be answered before the plan is put into action.


The first is the cost. Would the money be better spent elsewhere in times of financial constraint? The condition of the roads in the area is generally poor and improvements and repairs to worn out surfaces, subsidence and pot holes could be seen as more important.

Next there is the 20 mph speed limit for the whole village including the residential roads on both sides of Cowbridge Road. Is this really necessary? Would 20 mph zones just for the schools be better? At busy times, when it could be said that there is the greatest risk of accident in Pontyclun, one can rarely reach 20 mph anyway. Environmentally, vehicles are more polluting at 20 mph than 30 mph!

The principal cause of traffic congestion is heavy vehicles, which are totally unsuited for the main road through both Pontyclun and Brynsadler. These cover several routes and some could be diverted simply or banned by limiting vehicle size. Those accessing the industrial estate via Station Terrace should be made to use the Coed Cae Lane Industrial Estate route. Full size articulated vehicles cannot be necessary for deliveries to the small Tesco outlet and, even more out of proportion, is the use of the same juggernauts to deliver to Domino’s Pizza, one of the smallest retail premises in the village. It has also been noted that many trucks pass southwards though Pontyclun, Brynsadler and Talygarn only to return immediately. One assumes that they seek access to the motorway at Talygarn bridge and return when they find there is not. ‘No Access to M4’ signs at entrances to the area would solve this. Trucks from the quarry have no obvious alternative route if they wish to go north. This why a by-pass is needed for Talygarn, Brynsadler and Pontyclun, a scheme once discussed but apparently forgotten. If you are a village in the valleys you will get a by-pass or, more likely, already have one. The need here is just as great.


Parking is another part of the great plan. Many residents will find further restrictions on the time that they can park outside their own houses on Cowbridge Road, for example. We hope that the major cause of the present parking problems is to be removed shortly by the return to free parking in the Community Hall car park. However, any new restriction will mean fewer people using Pontyclun shops and serious hardship to our excellent retail outlets. There is also a plan to make four of the existing spaces on the main road into ‘disabled’ spaces. Do we need four?

Finally, there is the extra pedestrian crossing proposal. Few would disagree that crossing Cowbridge Road in Pontyclun can be hazardous, other than on the existing crossing or where there is a refuge in the centre of the road. However, the side effects of another crossing at the Post Office end of the village must be considered. These include any possible further reduction in parking spaces each side of any crossing and visibility of the crossing when approaching from the north over the railway bridge.

These few comments are simply ‘thinking points’. Your views are very welcome and, although technically too late, should still be addressed to RCTCBC as well.



CAR PARKING IN PONTYCLUN;
GOOD NEWS AT LAST

After a campaign, started by PAG but taken up and pressed home by the Community Hall Committee, it has been agreed that PCC will lease the car park opposite the Community Centre from RCTCBC and return it to a free car park for the benefit of all those shopping in Pontyclun, taking children to and from the primary school, using the Community Hall, etc.. The Community Hall Committee must be congratulated on this fantastic outcome. It is expected that the lease between PCC and RCTCBC will be signed during December and the car park charges will be removed shortly afterwards.



PONTYCLUN COMMUNITY TRUST NEWS

The Trust has asked that we keep you informed on progress with the land at Brynsadler Mill. Negotiations for a lease from Pontyclun Community Council to the Trust are well advanced but, as with all things legal, these take time. The basic agreements in the lease are decided but a few matters need to be finalised. Monthly meetings of the Trustees are held and the Trust now has over 140 members but more are always welcome.



ATTENDANCE AT COMMUNITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

It has come to the attention of the PAG representatives, who attend almost all Pontyclun Community Council meetings as observers, that one member of the Council has not attended a meeting since July 2009. This is not acceptable for an elected representative and it is PAG’s view that this councillor should be made to stand down and a by-election should be called. The next formal elections to the PCC are not due until 2012 so, if this non-attendance continues, there is under representation of the electorate on the Council. PAG asks the PCC to enforce the rules on this matter and act accordingly.



FOOTPATHS IN MISKIN

A resident of Miskin has approached PAG concerning the state of some footpaths, which link the various developments in the area. The footpath, which has been brought to PAG’s notice, is that linking Crystal Wood Drive with Brynamlwg. This footpath is understood to be well used by the community but has no surfacing material whatever. Are there other such paths? Would the money being planned to ‘calm’ Pontyclun be better used on surfacing these paths? Clearly those taking children to school, pushing pushchairs and the less able need a surface for sure footing and the paths should have been surfaced from the start. Why do the planning
authority not make the surfacing of such paths a compulsory part of the planning permission for the developers? Having failed in that simple and obvious manner, will they now rectify the matter by surfacing these paths and maintaining them? PAG will be investigating this and would like to hear of other footpaths in the area that are regularly used but in poor condition. Please let us know.



SHOP IN PONTYCLUN

PAG is aware of a considerable reduction in turnover being experienced by several of the established traders in Pontyclun. While some of this was the result of the car parking charges, and we hope will return, much is also the result of the Tesco store. PAG asks all local people to use the local shops whenever possible. ‘Use them or lose them’ is a fact of life for local shops. Please ‘use them’ to ensure we do not ‘lose them’.



ARTS FESTIVAL FOR PONTYCLUN?

It has been suggested that a festival could be held in Pontyclun to celebrate literary and musical art and possibly add the visual arts as well. There are published poets and writers living in the area as well as musicians and painters. PAG is happy to form a committee to organise this but we need the support of the local people. Please let PAG know if you are interested in such a festival and we will progress the idea if there is sufficient support.



SUPPORT FOR THE HUNGRY AT CHRISTMAS

FOODBANK is a local charity that supports and feeds the less fortunate in the district. Collection points for all that food that you will never get through at Christmas are to be found in Spar and the Bethel Baptist Church. PAG asks for your generosity.

          
PAG
wishes all residents of Pontyclun, Brynsadler, Groes Faen, Miskin and Talygarn a very Happy Christmas and a Prosperous 2011.


          

MEMBERS OF THE PAG COMMITTEE.

Chairman: Brendan O’Reilly,
Tel: Home - 226932, Mobile - 07855 030296.
e-mail: drmbor@aol.com
Vice-chairman/treasurer: Bruce Chivers.
Secretary: Janis Jones. Area Consultant: Tony Lane.
Newsletter Editor: Ken Forsdyke. Media PRO: Cecil Walker.
Conservation/Environment: Cecil Walker.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Pontyclun Community Centre Car Park Charges

Dear All,

This email is to update you on developments with the Car Parking charges at the Community Centre in Pontyclun.

The Community Council has negotiated with Rhondda Cynon Taff [RCT] that the Community Council rent the car park from RCT. The annual rental cost will be £6,700. Once the lease is signed it is intended that the charges will be removed. This is great news.

Unfortunately we do not know the date that the charges will be removed and we feel this is unlikely to be before Christmas - which is such a pity for the local businesses. We hope we are incorrect on this.

We understand that this car park is the ONLY car park in RCT that is not free coming up to Christmas.

PAG will have a newsletter out shortly. I'll also send this out by email.

If there are any volunteers to help deliver the PAG newsletter we would be delighted to hear from you - otherwise its back on the road for us!!

Every good wish,

Brendan O'Reilly

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

April Newsletter

PONTYCLUN ACTION GROUP
NEWSLETTER
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ISSUE 5 APRIL 2010

PUBLIC MEETING ON LAND AT BRYNSADLER MILL
TUESDAY 25th MAY, 7.30 p.m.
PONTYCLUN COMMUNITY CENTRE
FORMATION OF CHARITABLE TRUST
A Charitable Trust, ‘Pontyclun Ward Community Trust’, is in the process of being registered as a charity. It is hoped that this new Trust will be able to lease the land at Brynsadler Mill from Pontyclun Community Council and preserve it as a public amenity with emphasis on preserving the flora and fauna of the area and providing a peaceful public space in the village. The Trust will need the involvement of local residents in several ways.

This meeting is being arranged to encourage membership of the Trust and to explain the plans to the community for whose benefit it is being formed. Membership will be open to any interested resident with the aims of the Trust at heart and you will be able to join at the meeting. If you are unable to attend, please contact PAG (see below)for a membership form.
We will also require Trustees to run the trust and to be legally responsible for its affairs. We have an initial number, sufficient to register the charity and start the legal processes, but a proper and lasting Board of Trustees will be required shortly. The process for achieving this will also be outlined at the meeting and the way forward explained.
This is all great news compared with the situation a few months ago.PAG must thank the PCC for its understanding of the concerns of the people of Pontyclun. The PAG/PCC joint committee has worked very harmoniously on the matter and will continue to do so until the joint aims are achieved and, we hope, beyond.
PLEASE ATTEND THIS MEETING
CAR PARK CAMPAIGN GATHERS MOMENTUM
At a combined meeting of PAG, Pontyclun Community Council (PCC), Pontyclun Chamber of Trade, the Community Centre Committee, over 50’s Group, retired people and local residents held in the Community Centre on 23rd February, it was resolved to send a letter to all members of RCTCBC by e-mail and a formal letter to members of the cabinet of RCT objecting to the car parking charges at the Community Centre car park in Pontyclun. The seven groups involved in the meeting were unanimous in their condemnation of the imposition of charges.
The letter, with signatures from many of the groups, has now been sent. It dwelt on the inconvenience caused to the most vulnerable groups of the community, the damage to the trade of Pontyclun and, hence, village life as a whole and the total lack of advantage to any person or organisation resulting from the charges. It pointed out also that Pontyclun is the only Community Centre car park in RCT to which charges have been applied as far as can be determined.
The reductions in the numbers of our more elderly residents attending the Community Centre for lunch and the increased costs to members of the mother and toddler group are direct effects of the charges on the community. The fact that two user groups have stopped using the Centre also puts the Centre itself at risk financially. If any resident would like a copy of the letter, please contact PAGChairman, Brendan O’Reilly as below.
There has also been a decided decline in patronage of the Pontyclun shops since the introduction of the parking charges and this is simply not an acceptable result of heavy handed CBC behaviour.
A petition sign by over 1200 residents has also been prepared and submitted to the full council at RCTCBC.
Be assured, this campaign has in no way run out of steam and all the local groups involved will continue to negotiate firmly with RCTCBC.
bbbbbbbbbb
SIXTH FORM AT Y PANT SCHOOL
There is move afoot by RCTCBC to do away with a number of sixth forms in local comprehensive schools and develop ‘sixth form colleges’ as separate centres of learning. This move would include Y Pant School in Pontyclun.
There are many reasons why this rearrangement of education at sixth form level is undesirable and among these are the very high cost, the travel that will be required and the lack of continuity in local education. Students will have only two years in such a ‘college’ and then move on to the world of employment or to university and higher education. Disruption at two year intervals cannot be good for learning, surely.
A PUBLIC MEETING WILL BE HELD AT Y-PANT SCHOOL HALL ON THURSDAY 13th MAY AT 7 p.m.. Please attend if you have any interest in the future of education in Pontyclun.
Full details of a campaign to reverse this decision can be found atwww.sosypant.com and readers are encouraged to visit this excellent web site.
bbbbbbbbbb
GENERAL ELECTION HUSTINGS MEETING IN PONTYCLUN
With the General Election on May 6th a meeting has been arranged in Pontyclun where you will be able to ask questions of all the main party candidates for our Westminster constituency. This is a scoop for Pontyclun and is the idea of Alan Watt, who should be congratulated on organising the event.
The meeting will take place at Bethel Baptist Church, Heol Miskin at 7.30 p.m. on Tuesday 27th April.
The candidates from most of the parties standing, including Conservative, Green, Labour, Liberal Democrat, Plaid Cymru and UKIP, have agreed to attend. Each will give a short address before the question session begins.
As a large turn out is expected the meeting will be organised with time limits for answers and only written questions accepted. You are asked to write your question on one side of a postcard, with your name, and these will be placed in receptacle as you arrive at the meeting. The meeting chairman will draw cards at random for the questioner to ask and candidates to answer. Duplicate questions will be avoided but no other censorship, within normal rules of etiquette, will be applied.
This is a first for Pontyclun and all interested in the future of theUnited Kingdom, in these very difficult times, are urged to attend.
Addition: The Hustings meeting did go ahead as planned and it was attended by all of the candidates, superbly organised and went very smoothly. 
SOS y Pant were there in numbers wearning white teashirts which said - "Save out 6th Form College" and they displayed plackards. They really make their point, which PAG supports.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Hustings Meeting at the Bethel Baptist Church

All of the Parliamentary Candidates for the Pontypridd constituency appeared at the hustings meeting last night. I have to congratulate the Members of the Church for the work they did in preparation for the meeting. This was very impressive.

200 people turned up which is a great turnout and there was a very lively debate. I can't comment here about what was siad by the candidates because PAG is politically neutral.

The meeting was screened live on the internet by Media Wales and it was also reported on live on Twitter. The link is here: http://yourponty.walesonline.co.uk/2010/04/27/live-debate-follow-pontys-hustings-from-home/ [click the grey screen to see the live tweets]. This is the first time we've come across this and it is fantastic. The potential for this is huge.

There was also a TV company present. This company is doing a documentary on the Parliamentary process. So this was also interesting.

The group opposing the closure of the 6th Form College at y Pant had a big presence. They had banners and wore teashirts with "Save Our Sixth Form College". They really got their message across that we want to Keep this College open. Congratulations to them.

All in all a great event.

Friday, April 9, 2010

Reply from Councillor Andrew Morgan

Thank you for your detailed letter dated the 19th march 2010 regarding the issues affecting the adjacent Community Centre, residents and businesses in the town relating from the car parking charges in the Heol yr Orsaf Car Park, Pontyclun.

As you are aware, the charges were introduced in May last year, not only in Pontyclun but also in other town centres with larger car parks - Porth, Tonypandy and Mountain Ash. At the same time, charges were also increased in Aberdare and Pontypridd where they had been in place for many years.

These changes to the car park charging regime were introduced as part of a raft of measures required to address the Council's financial shortfalls brought about by lower than required income from the Assembly. Even though the usage of the car park has been less than anticipated, the income received is more than covering the monthly outgoings and will recoup the initial set up cost and provide a net revenue stream for the Council.

The issues that you raise regarding the cost to traders to park in the town centre and users of the Community Centre were all raised at the time the car parking charging orders were the subject of an advertising period during which objections could be made. These representations were considered prior to a decision being made whether to proceed with the charging. However, the Council was in a position where it could no longer afford to run the car parks without any form of income. As such, the decision was reluctantly made to implement the charges. At present, the Council's financial position has not improved and there are currently no proposals to remove the charges.

I would, however, inform you that there has been an approach from the Pontyclun Community Council to purchase the Car park from the Council. A full valuation has now been undertaken by this Council and details have been forwarded to that Council for their consideration.

Yours sincerely,

Councillor Andrew Morgan
Cabinet Member for Transport and Customer Care

PAG archive: 2009

Tuesday, August 18, 2009


Why I oppose selling the land at Brynsadler Mill

Arguments against selling the land at Brynsadler Mill are manifold and I thought I would start a new string of comment to encourage people to state their own reasons as well.

This contribution is a bit of a 'thought piece' to try to provide a possible explanation for what lies behind our recent development experiences.

Drive around the UK motorways and it will be clear that junctions like ours at 34 are a major attraction for development. Some of the development was planned and intended in the original siting of the junctions others have grown like Topsy, attracted to the windfall profits involved. It appears we are very much in the latter category.

Motorways and motorway junctions have been created by community investment from our payment of taxes and rates. However, they also suddenly set in motion a potential increase in value of what was previously relatively isolated agricultural land. The American railroad system was based on the knowledge that this would happen with the state providing railroad investors compensatory grants of wide strips of land either side of the track. Who said US capitalism was not state subsidised!

Around our junction 34 we have seen the community investment provide an opportunity for those who could afford it, to purchase agriculture land. Then starts the garnering of the increase in value by a process of creeping planning gain - bit by bit persuading councils to change the designated use of the land so what then becomes windfall profits fall to the land owners. New housing development, the expansion of an industrial estate south of the railway line are examples of the way this process has affected Pontyclun. And the process will continue until all the value has been squeezed out of the original land purchases and the area is completely developed.

The only people who can say enough is enough are local communities and their local political representatives. Clearly if the two work together a planned and strategic compromise can be achieved where a balance is struck between a sustainable community, sustainable green spaces, a varied habitat and development. The Local Development Plan is one way of doing this, but as we have seen from the experience of the last Strategic Plan, ways can be found to make valuable and profitable adjustments at the margin. Constant vigilance and policing are clearly required to make a plan stick if the community say 'enough is enough, we are now at our sustainable limits'.

That is where we are in Pontyclun and we are saying enough is enough but the majority of our local political representatives on the Community Council and County Council do not see it in this way: effectively leaving us to fight the pressures of profit taking and creeping planning gain with more than one hand tied behind our backs. It is little wonder that these councillors did not mention their intention to sell Community Council assets to developers in their elections addresses; it is little wonder they did not mention their intention in a recent Plaid newsletter whilst at the same time they were preparing to move to sell the land atBrynsadler Mill without given specific notice of their intention before the meeting: they know that the residents believe enough is enough in relation to local development and that they would not have been elected had they been open in their intentions. They do not have a mandate to sell the land.

They are leaving us as a community to fight the developers and knowing what power and pressures we are up against and we rely totally on active local support and unity and our preparedness to use all the tactics available to us, which in the current case isPAG. It is interesting that other local communities have also contacted us to share experiences as they are experiencing the same pressures: Tyle Garw and Talbot Green for example. This is not surprising as it is the same forces at play.

A final comment on the commercial pressures on the local community cannot pass without also mentioning the PontyclunTesco development. It is clear what this multinational company is about and it is the same power game and profit taking. Build a huge store and then build small local ones to close down other businesses forcing people to shop in the original large store; get market dominance - oligopoly if you wish to be posh - and you in a position to dominate consumer choice and price and write your own profit cheque. Tesco already have 31% of the UK market - locally I suspect it is much higher than that.

For me enough is enough means a sustainable community, local economy and conserving the variety of local habitats. In addition, having some understanding of the wider context helps to not only provide a knowledge of what we are up against but also how many other communities are in the same position. It provides the basis of unity and a huge cooperative resource of ideas to draw upon to draw hard and fast boundaries around development, affect the nature of this development and ensure that what was original community investment can be used for community benefit.

Public Meeting Report

Over 80 supporters braved the weather and defied holiday mode to attend the PAG public meeting on Monday 10th August at the Pontyclun Community Centre. Democracy reigned and Ken Forsdyke Chaired the meeting and Brendan O'Reilly the PAG Chair gave activity reports.

A short history of why the land at Brynsadler Mill came to be owned by the Community Council was given by Brendan who then went over the reasons why the land should remain publicly owned and stewarded. He then described all the current activities of PAG including the huge attendance of the public at the last Community Council; public petitioning, letter writing and two newsletters; complaints to the Local Government Ombudsman and Wales Audit; initial moves toward a judicial review; and ongoing political discussions.

Conservation of the land was stress in comprehensive detail by John Francis who covered the wide range of birds, insects, fish and mammals, including otters, that live in the habitat. Legal and procedural arguments were updated by Tony Lane who provided important and detailed documentary evidence. Media activities and the newsletter were covered in reports given by Cecil Walker and Ken Forsdyke.

Supportive and friendly banter from the floor kept the meeting lively as well as the questions and discussion that followed the reports. It was clear that in addtion to PAG other residents were doing their thing, such as writing to the press. Speaking from the floor Community Councillor Paul Griffiths explained why he supported the campaign along with two other Community Councillors, Sarah Jenkins and Dan Clayton-Jones, and described the historical connection between some councillors and questionable planning decisions over the last 10 years.

Support was given to the campaign against the car parking charges and suggestions made about how to take it forward together with PAG.

An impassioned appeal for financial support to continue the work of PAG was made by Ann Bennett which resulted in a collection of over £460!: many thanks for all those contributions.

Active public support was called for at the end of the meeting and in particular attendance at the next meeting of the Pontyclun Community Council at 19.00 on Tuesday 22nd September at the chapel in Groes Faen. Put it in your diary and see you all there.

Friday, August 7, 2009


PAG Newsletter 2. A PAG posting.

PONTYCLUN ACTION GROUP
NEWSLETTER
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ISSUE 2 AUGUST 2009

COUNCIL IGNORES WISHES OF ELECTORATE

At a meeting of Pontyclun Community Council held on Tuesday 14th July, the clear wishes of the residents of Pontyclun were treated with total disdain by the majority of the members of the Council.

The Pontyclun Community Centre was ‘standing room only’ as about 200 members of the public attended a Community Council meeting at which the subject of the sale of the community owned open space land at Brynsadler Mill was to be discussed. However, the result of this strong lobbying was to be the total ignoring of public opinion and the decision by the Council, which, in theory represents those present, to sell the land by public auction.

The Councillors in favour of selling this land are: Cllrs. Jonathan Huish, Merfyn Rae, Ann Cale, Gordon Norman, Graham Davies, Steve Rogers and Carole Willis.

A decision, in principle, to sell the land had been made at the PCC May meeting. This decision had been for the sale to a developer who already owns the adjacent land. However, after strong lobbying against the sale, the Council was to consider the matter in more detail at the July meeting and make a decision as to whether the ‘in principle’ decision should stand. Hence the very large number of people present in an attempt to influence the Council not to sell the land.

The Chair, Cllr. Willis from Groesfaen stated that points would be listened to and questions could be raised in a period of time that she would determine, but the questions would not be answered! Several statements were made by members of the PAG committee, many questions asked and none answered.

It soon became clear that nothing was being listened to and that the decision of the majority

of the Council to sell the land had already been made. A motion to sell by auction was proposed by Cllr Jonathan Huish and this was carried by a vote of seven to two.

COUNCILLORS DELIBERATELY MISLEAD PUBLIC.

When the land adjoining the PCC owned land was sold by the WDA some time ago, a strip, two metres wide and along the whole edge with the community land, was to be made into a footpath with styles from that strip on to the community land as a means of access. Unfortunately there was an oversight or legal muddle at the time as the access across the styles to the community land is for ‘agricultural purposes only’. PCC has obtained no less than three legal opinions on this matter and Councillors Rea and Huish used these legal opinions at the meeting to state that ‘there is no public access to the land’ and hence the land is useless. This is untrue. The Council never asked the question as to access to the land from either Cowbridge Road or from Millfield. A letter from RCT is in the hands of PAG stating that, subject to certain safety considerations such as a kerbside barrier, there is no problem in the creation of such access from Cowbridge Road.

PAG has appointed a solicitor and taken legal advice to act for the community on this matter.

FALSE INFORMATION GIVEN TO LOCAL PRESS BY COUNCILLOR.

Councillor Rea is quoted in the Pontypridd and Llantrisant Observer of July 16th repeating the story he used at the Council meeting about access but compounding the inaccuracy by saying that the land ‘can’t be used unless it’s for agricultural purposes’. Furthermore he is reported as stating that, ‘It’s just a strip about 500 yards long and about three foot (sic) wide’. This is incorrect. The land totals about 3 acres including a riverside strip, about 5 metres wide at its narrowest, and an area of woodland. The area described by Rea is about 0.1 acre. Feeding such false information to a newspaper is clearly contrary to the public interest. PAG want him to resign for misleading the public. Such behaviour is intolerable.


PARKING PROBLEMS IN
STATION TERRACE

In the July edition of PAG Newsletter it was stated that matters, other than the land sale, would be followed up on the residents’ behalf and that one of these would be parking in Pontyclun. This has come to a head earlier than expected with PAG and we have had discussions with residents of Station Terrace who complain that they are unable to park outside their own properties. They told PAG that this had become noticeably worse since the ridiculous parking charges were imposed on Pontyclun public car park by RCT. Station Terrace suffers further from the use of the narrow road by heavy goods vehicles accessing the industrial area across the river bridge at the end of the road.

It has also come to our notice that parking charges in other communities in RCT aredifferent with some paying considerably less than Pontyclun and at least one community remaining free of charge.

There are, in fact, a range of matters here, one affecting the other. The whole matter of parking, led by and shown by the problems of Station Terrace, are to be dealt with by a sub-committee of PAG which will include residents directly affected.

Volunteers
PAG needs volunteers to deliver our newsletters. We also need legal and IT advice. If you are legally qualified and would like to help please contact a member of the Committee. Computer / Website expertise would also be most welcome.


PUBLIC MEETING TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS WITH PONTYCLUN COMMUNITY COUNCIL

PAG is calling a Public Meeting at 7.00 pm on Monday 10th August in the Community Hall Pontyclun to discuss the land issue, parking and other matters that residents of the area may wish to raise. Please make a note of this in your diaries and come along. The more residents that are present the better. We need YOUR support.


DONATIONS

PAG has been approached by several residents wishing to donate to the work we are undertaking on your behalf. We would much appreciate a small standing order to the PAG bank account. Details of how to do this may be obtained from Bruce Chivers on 01443 222904 or jbchivers@aol.com

PAG thanks those who have made donations so far and all those who intend so to do.


COMMITTEE INFORMATION.

Chairman: Brendan O’Reilly,
Tel: Home - 226932
Mobile - 07855 030296
e-mail: drmbor@aol.com

Vice-chairman: Bruce Chivers.

Secretaries: Andrew Jones,
Janis Jones.

Treasurer: Bruce Chivers.

Media PRO: Cecil Walker.

Newsletter Editor: Ken L. Forsdyke.

Conservation & Liaison : Ann Bennett.

Area Consultant: Tony Lane.

Members: Glen & John Francis.



Published by Pontyclun Action Group,pontyclunactiongroup@talktalk.net

PAG Newsletter 1. A PAG posting.

PONTYCLUN ACTION GROUP
NEWSLETTER
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ISSUE 1 JULY 2009

What is the ‘PONTYCLUN ACTION GROUP’? Who are the ‘PONTYCLUN ACTION GROUP’?

These are the questions that, as a reader of this Newsletter, you are certain to ask, hence, we have started the first issue with the answers. PAG was formed as the outcome of a well attended public meeting, held in the Ivor Arms on 16th June, at which the topic of discussion was the proposal by Pontyclun Community Council to sell the land opposite the houses in Millfield and the river bank joining that land to Cowbridge Road by the bridge to a known developer. This land belongs to the Community Council and was bought by the Council for the benefit of the community. The feeling of the meeting was that action should be taken to prevent the sale for any other purpose and a committee was formed, initially for that purpose. That committee is PAG. There is a list of the members on the reverse of this Newsletter with their contact details should you wish to speak to any of them on any subject that concerns you. The Group represents the whole area covered by the Pontyclun Community Council and not just Pontyclun itself.

The committee held its first meeting on Monday 22nd June and intends to meet weekly for the foreseeable future. There will also be attendance at all Community Council meetings in order to ensure that they do not attempt to push through the sale in an underhand manner. The committee has lost trust in the Community Councillors who have been in favour of the proposed sale of land because it is clear that this sale is not in the best interests of the community that they purport to represent. Furthermore, they have been in possession of this land for several years and have done nothing whatsoever to make it accessible for community use.

THE LAND PROBLEM.

The initial aim of PAG is to do all that is within its power to prevent the sale of the land and its subsequent loss to residents as a local amenity.

We shall be calling on the community to assist in this aim in several ways. Please act as and when we ask for your help. We are a deliberately small committee and will need your assistance from time to time. We may wish to hold a protest at some point in the future and, if this is necessary, we will get word to the community, either by the Newsletter or, if time is short, by word of mouth. The intention is to secure that piece of land for the community in perpetuity. To this aim we ask that you write to your Community and County Councillors and to your AMs and MPs on the matter. To assist with this we are arranging for a letter that can be signed and forwarded to be available in shops in Pontyclun shortly. Look out for them and, if you do not think that you feel able to write an individual letter, please sign and send one of these.
Community Council Land

Map showing area of land which belongs to Pontyclun Community Council.

FUTURE MATTERS FOR PAG.

Once the very urgent matter of the land has been resolved, the group feels that there are many other issues, within the area covered by the Community Council, with which it should be involved.

These issues concern the ‘environment’ of the area in the broadest sense, not just the natural environment, which is included of course, but the whole ambience of ‘Greater Pontyclun’. PAG is there to ensure life in the Pontyclun area remains as pleasant as we who live there know it is. PAG wishes to ensure that nothing is done to spoil Pontyclun and that, where there are existing problems, improvements are made to make our community an even better place to live. PAG would like to hear from you about matters that concern you.

Parking is an obvious candidate for PAG’s attention. The recent introduction of parking charges by RCT is clearly detrimental to the residents and shopkeepers of Pontyclun alike. PAG would like to see the charges removed since they cause an increase in street parking and obstruction to the already over loaded Cowbridge Road.

The state of the railings around the playing fields is another. These very fine examples of very old iron railings are in a poor state of maintenance. The matter needs to be addressed urgently.

FUNDING.

Unfortunately very little in this world comes without cost these days. If any member of the community would like to make a donation to the campaign, it would be greatly appreciated.

It would be very helpful if those concerned with the future quality of life in the area would set up a small standing order (say £2-3 per month) to support the work of PAG. Please contact the Chairman.


INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION.

It is intended to publish this Newsletter as frequently as necessary to keep you up to date. However, if anybody wishes to be kept informed more frequently, please send your e-mail address to any committee member and we will include you on the e-mail list.


MEMBERS OF THE PAG COMMITTEE.

The following officers were elected by the committee at its first meeting on Monday 22nd June 2009:
Chairman: Brendan O’Reilly,
Tel: Home - 226932
Mobile - 07855 030296
e-mail: drmbor@aol.com

Vice-chairman: Bruce Chivers.

Secretaries: Andrew Jones,
Janice Jones.

Treasurer: Bruce Chivers.

Media PRO: Cecil Walker.

Newsletter Editor: Ken L. Forsdyke.

Conservation & Liaison : Ann Bennett.

Area Consultant: Tony Lane


Community Council Meeting on Tuesday 14th July at Pontyclun Community Centre 7pm. This is the meeting that may decide this issue. Please come. It is essential that as many people as possible turn up.


Published by Pontyclun Action Group,.pontyclunactiongroup@talktalk.net